mikelepage: Mars-g torus hotel and LEO torus station (2022–2024)
Design summary
- Resort target (2022). Chosen on Hall's comfort chart: 25–30 m radius, ~3.8 rpm, 0.379 g ("Mars g = 37.9%, not 1/3").
- Running spinward at 22% of rim speed changes perceived g by ±50%, and the corridor doubles as a running track.
- Cost <$1B for 20 guests at 75% occupancy + 12 staff; at $30k per person per day, payback in ~6 years mikelepage, 2022-10-23; mikelepage, 2022-10-24.
- Station specs (2023). A torus of ~24–28 m radius at Mars g, >2× ISS mass (~1000 t), for 24–36 people. Modular assembly from Starship with minimal EVA; "SCWorM" waste module feeding algae and aquaponics mikelepage, 2023-01-30.
- Hotel (2023). mikelepage, 2023-05-16
- 30–40 people in a torus of 18 hinged module pairs (one pair per launch). Each pair is 4.6 m deep × 13.5 m wide; occupied radius 24–26 m; 3.8 rpm for Mars g.
- Rooms: king room, dorm, kitchen, dining, gym, lab, waste. A centre cupola for views.
- Power: "IROSA MAX" arrays (9.5 × 40 m), ~240 kW total. Radiators on angled module roofs, shaded in the edge-on configuration.
- Two Starships dock at once. Starship OMS opposes a central motor for spin-up/down and reboost. "Bogie" units on radial arms assemble the station and rebalance the CoM. Pod shuttles carry 6–8 people.
- 21 Starship launches in total.
- LEO toroidal Mars-g station (2024). mikelepage, 2024-07-23
- 36 m inner / ~42 m outer radius, 250 m circumference. 48 Starship modules (~14 × 6 m cross-section, long axis parallel to the spin axis), added as fast as Starship launches.
- Always ≥1 Starship docked, providing power and damping.
- A central zero-g module with an internal counter-rotating cage (no rotating seals). Zero EVAs.
- An active structural bisector allows closure mikelepage, 2024-07-24. Four-step mating sequence mikelepage, 2024-07-31.
Critiques raised
- Twark_Main: a torus uses ~2.7× more shielding than a compact bola, and is a long thin linear layout with bad circulation Twark_Main, 2024-07-05; Twark_Main, 2024-07-30.
- mikelepage's reply: mass production and semi-autonomous berthing may beat the shielding penalty in LEO mikelepage, 2024-07-20.
Open questions
- Can hinged module pairs be berthed robotically at Starship cadence?
Related pages
Sources
Forum posts
- mikelepage, 2022-10-23 (reply #2180): Resort design. Post. Attachments: gravComfort03-target.jpg.
- mikelepage, 2022-10-24 (reply #2186, 1 like): Economics. Post.
- mikelepage, 2023-01-30 (reply #3191): Station specs; SCWorM. Post.
- mikelepage, 2023-05-16 (reply #3717, 2 likes): Space hotel design (2 likes). Post. Attachments: Screen Shot 2023-05-16 at 5.54.00 pm.png, Screen Shot 2023-05-16 at 6.31.55 pm.png, Screen Shot 2023-05-16 at 7.23.02 pm.png.
- Twark_Main, 2024-07-05 (reply #4646): 2.7× shielding. Post.
- mikelepage, 2024-07-20 (reply #4652, 1 like): Reply (1 like). Post.
- mikelepage, 2024-07-23 (reply #4656): 2024 torus design. Post.
- mikelepage, 2024-07-24 (reply #4661, 1 like): Bisector support (1 like). Post.
- Twark_Main, 2024-07-30 (reply #4668): Bad circulation. Post.
- mikelepage, 2024-07-31 (reply #4673): Mating sequence. Post.