Mass balance, "wobble" and vibration

What happens when crew, cargo and fluids move, and how to keep the rotation axis where docking ports and bearings need it.

Key results

What actually happens

Passive balancing

Active trim systems

Vibration and resonance

  • No wind in space, so Tacoma-Narrows-type vortex shedding is unlikely. Station-keeping thrust must avoid structural resonances Coastal Ron, 2022-11-29; lamontagne, 2022-11-29; ppnl, 2022-11-29.
  • Stiffness ∝ depth³, so a tube tens of metres deep is orders of magnitude stiffer than Tacoma's 2.4 m girders Barley, 2022-11-29.
  • Sources in flexible structures: motors, fans, people, liquids, transfer rings, solar pressure, gravity gradient, drag. Electric turnbuckles or shock absorbers on cables lamontagne, 2018-08-04. Power-line-style dampers on Island Zero's tension rods lamontagne, 2026-07-08.
  • A single rigid rotating structure has no vibration source. Bearings between masses introduce vibration Coastal Ron, 2023-01-24.
  • Coastal Ron's summary: narrow wheels (diameter/width ≥10) need little attention. Wobble is mainly a concern for "fat" wheels Coastal Ron, 2023-11-01.
  • The construction phase, when large masses are added, is the hardest balance problem JohnFornaro, 2023-10-31.

Open questions

Sources

Forum posts

  • Roy_H, 2014-03-16 (reply #173): Oil ballast; ~1 m tolerance. Post.
  • Paul451, 2015-03-03 (reply #484): Real problem: mass moving parallel to spin axis. Post.
  • Paul451, 2015-03-12 (reply #513, 1 like): Water in baffled channels self-corrects. Post. Attachments: Spin - mass flow.png.
  • Paul451, 2015-11-09 (reply #743): Off-centre vibration myth; free-flyer rotates about CoM. Post.
  • mikelepage, 2016-01-12 (reply #803): Movable hub on cables. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2018-08-04 (reply #1144): Vibration sources in flexible structures. Post. Attachments: Station3c.jpg, Station3d.jpg.
  • Paul451, 2018-08-05 (reply #1153, 1 like): Non-rotating hub requires CoM exactly at hub. Post.
  • Roy_H, 2018-08-05 (reply #1155): Oil for balance tanks. Post. Attachments: SpaceStation.pdf.
  • Coastal Ron, 2018-08-05 (reply #1157): Water better. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2018-08-05 (reply #1158): 12-tank water system ~20 t. Post. Attachments: water balance.jpg.
  • lamontagne, 2018-08-05 (reply #1162, 1 like): Water better (lamontagne). Post.
  • Paul451, 2019-01-09 (reply #1298): Free water settles at lightest point. Post.
  • Aussie_Space_Nut, 2019-03-31 (reply #1451, 1 like): Battery packs on rails to move CoR. Post. Attachments: 0002-Realistic-Near-Term-Rotating-Spacestation-HubAndArmOnly.jpg, 0002-Realistic-Near-Term-Rotating-Spacestation.jpg.
  • Paul451, 2022-09-30 (reply #1828): Crew at evac points during docking. Post.
  • Roy_H, 2022-10-04 (reply #1854): Target eccentricity 1–2 cm. Post.
  • Paul451, 2022-10-26 (reply #2225): Floors tilt 1% per 1% radius offset. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2022-11-29 (reply #2494, 1 like): No periodic energy source → resonance unlikely. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2022-11-29 (reply #2507): Avoid thrust resonances. Post.
  • Barley, 2022-11-29 (reply #2513): Stiffness ∝ depth³. Post.
  • ppnl, 2022-11-29 (reply #2520, 1 like): Tacoma was vortex shedding; start small. Post.
  • JohnFornaro, 2023-01-15 (reply #2909): Counterweight elevators in spokes. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-01-16 (reply #2913): Three tanks at 120° (laundry machines). Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-01-16 (reply #2935): Starship 0.0015% of station mass. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-01-17 (reply #2940): No wobble in free flight; CoR moves to new stable spot. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-01-17 (reply #2946): Fourth central tank varies L. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-01-22 (reply #3026): Hinged panels as wobble dampers. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-01-24 (reply #3064): No vibration in single rigid body; bearings introduce it. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2023-05-04 (reply #3665): 500 kg → 7 cm CoM shift. Post. Attachments: Airlock design (1).xlsx.
  • lamontagne, 2023-05-09 (reply #3669): 120 kg → 8 mm. Post.
  • JohnFornaro, 2023-05-09 (reply #3670): ToS ban synchronized marching. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-05-11 (reply #3676, 1 like): Docking tolerance 100 mm, 4°, 0.2°/s; passive water trick (1 like). Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-10-31 (reply #4244): Fluid tuned mass damper. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-10-31 (reply #4246, 2 likes): Model-based control; 4 weights minimum (2 likes). Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-10-31 (reply #4247): TMD saturates; thrusters needed. Post.
  • JohnFornaro, 2023-10-31 (reply #4249): Construction phase biggest balance problem. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-10-31 (reply #4256): N tanks → N−1 DoF; ~8 tanks for torus. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-10-31 (reply #4257): 12-tank ringed cross controls 6 axes. Post.
  • LMT, 2023-11-01 (reply #4262): Hendricks 1971 control systems. Post. Attachments: Hendricks 1971.png.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-11-01 (reply #4263): D/W ≥10 wheels needn't worry. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-11-03 (reply #4270): Trim systems reduce, not eliminate, thruster use. Post.
  • Greg Hullender, 2023-11-05 (reply #4275): Moving weights with AI. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2023-11-06 (reply #4278): Tanks beat weights. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-11-06 (reply #4281, 1 like): In-plane mass distribution doesn't cause instability (1 like). Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-11-06 (reply #4282): Pump ballast into storm shelter walls. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-11-06 (reply #4283): Pivoting array arms for axial balance. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2023-11-06 (reply #4286): Ballast + fire water. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-11-06 (reply #4287): Keep safety systems independent. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2023-11-07 (reply #4301, 1 like): Mercury cost. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2023-11-08 (reply #4320): Limits for inhabitants unresolved. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-11-08 (reply #4326): Mercury rejected. Post.
  • Paul451, 2023-11-08 (reply #4335, 1 like): Axial imbalance → fixed floor tilt. Post.
  • Barley, 2023-11-08 (reply #4336, 1 like): Nutation vs precession terms (1 like). Post.
  • LMT, 2023-11-09 (reply #4341, 1 like): Eu:CROPIS passive water damper (1 like). Post. Attachments: EuCROPIS water tank.png.
  • Paul451, 2024-01-30 (reply #4437, 1 like): People as part of motion control (1 like). Post.
  • lamontagne, 2024-01-30 (reply #4438): 100 people in 3000 t → 30 cm. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2024-01-30 (reply #4442): Layered balancing approach. Post.
  • Coastal Ron, 2024-08-03 (reply #4699): Passive stability only. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2024-08-03 (reply #4701): Trim tanks OK. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2024-09-02 (reply #4780): Density-sorted storage instead of ballast. Post.
  • Paul451, 2025-04-22 (reply #4893): CoR ≠ geometric centre → whip. Post.
  • Twark_Main, 2025-09-14 (reply #4955): Stewart platform trims small wobbles. Post.
  • lamontagne, 2026-07-08 (reply #5072, 1 like): Damping in tension rods?. Post. Attachments: Module Assembly_e.jpg, Image15_000.jpg.

External references

  • Queijo et al. (1988) and Garrett et al. (1991), NASA studies with water trim and counter-rotating inertial balance tanks (NTRS 19880010196, 19910010864).
  • Hendricks (1971), Martin Marietta, AG station control systems LMT, 2023-11-01.